How to Conduct Voir Dire: A Practical Guide
The literal translation of the French phrase voir dire is “to speak the truth.” In law, it’s the process of questioning an individual prior to jury duty or witnessing to determine their suitability.
Learning how to select a jury who’ll listen to your arguments without a predisposition against your client is a key step in winning at trial—so learning how to conduct voir dire questioning is critical for trial attorneys.
Voir dire is your hands-on-the-steering-wheel moment to exert control over who will ultimately pass judgment on your case. While that control is limited by the potential jury pool and your ability to question and dismiss them, voir dire is when you can directly ask for truthful answers from prospective jurors.
Voir dire questioning allows attorneys to:
In addition to weighing in on who should be included or dismissed from the jury pool, voir dire examination provides critical information that can help you tailor upcoming arguments and demonstratives to a specific jury’s makeup and characteristics.
Although you don’t know who’ll be stepping into the jury box for questioning, that doesn’t mean winging it. Voir dire examination prep can include:
Voir dire questions are used to uncover potential jurors’ relevant biases. Questions may cover:
Basically, your questions should help you determine if an individual’s vote during deliberation can be predicted to rule against your client due to bias, individual circumstance or character.
Voir dire limits can vary by jurisdiction, case type, and possible penalty involved. Federal guidelines include:
The nature of questions may also be limited, depending on jurisdictional rules, so as to avoid certain content or outcomes such as:
You’ll need to engage an audience, make detailed observations and on-the-spot decisions, and collect information for further use on voir dire days.
Getting the jury pool to be candid can be challenging. Instead of a back-and-forth Q&A, try to enter into a conversation that you begin by acknowledging biases. You can:
Voir dire challenges fall into two categories. They’re either:
Peremptory challenges are at the attorney’s discretion, usually based on a potential juror’s background, experiences, or opinions, beliefs or values.
Federally, attorneys are typically limited to three peremptory challenges in civil cases and 3–20 in criminal procedures depending on whether it’s a capital, other felony, or misdemeanor case.1,2 Lower courts’ limits vary state to state.
Challenges for cause are based on reasons including prior acquaintanceships or knowledge, bias or obvious prejudice, and inability to serve. They’re typically unlimited in number.
The voir dire process is the make-it-or-break-it step in jury selection. With no control over who shows up for jury duty and limits on your ability to question and dismiss potential jurors, every move counts.
That’s where the trial services division of U.S. Legal Support—the home of elite service and consulting firm TrialQuest —comes in. Our team of experienced jury consultants, Ph.D. behavioral scientists, and psychologists have consulted on more than 20,000 high-risk trials, arbitrations, and mediations across nearly all practice areas and jurisdictions.
We support nationwide attorneys and firms across nearly all practice areas and jurisdictions with voir dire and jury research and consulting, mock trials, witness preparation, trial graphics, demonstratives, and trial presentation and technology services.
Reach out today to discuss your voir dire, jury selection, and other trial and legal support needs.
Sources:
Content published on the U.S. Legal Support blog is reviewed by professionals in the legal and litigation support services field to help ensure accurate information. The information provided in this blog is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice for attorneys or clients.